Literary Scholarship And Criticism Of Shakespeare s The...

Shakespeare critic and Harvard literature professor, Harold Bloom, asserts that Shakespeare is the metaphorical â€Å"inventor of man.† Bloom writes: The plays remain the outward limit of human achievement: aesthetically, cognitively, in certain ways morally, even spiritually. They abide beyond the end of the mind’s reach, we cannot catch up to them. Shakespeare will go on explaining us, in part because, he invented us† (pp. 19-20). Bloom’s audacious evaluation of Shakespeare has been echoed throughout the canon of literary scholarship and criticism. In fact, Bloom’s â€Å"invention† thesis, found in Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human, represents a culmination of centuries of teaching and reflection upon the famous English poet’s craft. This†¦show more content†¦Hamlet: The Prince of Denmark is a hallmark example of Shakespeare’s contemplation of social tolerance and equity in the exploration of human sociology. In this play, we see the malignant ambition of newly throned King Claudius, the questionable decision-making of Queen Gertrude, and the emotionally-preying and encompassing force of murdered King Hamlet’s ghost, construct the grounds for contemplation of human drama; this contemplation is essentially distilled and literally embodied by the character of Prince Hamlet. Moreover, the â€Å"truth,† hidden at the onset of this play, sets the inter nal and external conflict for Prince Hamlet as well as the figurative stage for a study of human character and action, or alternatively, ego and power. Prince Hamlet’s own ego is festered by the crime against his father: a murder committed by Hamlet’s ambitious uncle, Claudius, whose own ego has led him down a the path of a usurper. Yet, Shakespeare exposes that the pains of human ego are not morally equivalent between these two. Hamlet’s pain and feelings of slight come at the potential truth that his father was murder. His ego is that of a wounded sense of self created out of the anguish he feels in his inability to take deliberate action against Claudius, driven out of the lack of evidence to trulyShow MoreRelated Schools and Education - Understanding the Rise in Apathy, Cheating and Plagiarism3796 Words   |  16 Pagesmakes sense because after the fall of Rome, Western Europe fell into a dark age. Not until the Renaissance do we see another spurt of human ism that marked the great classic periods of Greece and Rome. Before the invention of the printing press, the rise in literacy, and the focus on humans as perfectible creations who can create important works by themselves, there was very little need for authorial ownership. In the Renaissance, associating an author’s name with a work was generally tied to prosecutionRead MoreOrganisational Theory230255 Words   |  922 PagesHoldt Christensen, Associate Professor, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark McAuley et al.’s book is thought-provoking, witty and highly relevant for understanding contemporary organizational dilemmas. The book engages in an imaginative way with a wealth of organizational concepts and theories as well as provides insightful examples from the practical world of organizations. The authors’ sound scholarship and transparent style of writing set the book apart, making it an ingenious read which invitesRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills4041 31 Words   |  1617 Pagessolution for courses in Principles of Management, Human Resources, Strategy, and Organizational Behavior that helps you actively study and prepare material for class. Chapter-by-chapter activities, including built-in pretests and posttests, focus on what you need to learn and to review in order to succeed. Visit www.mymanagementlab.com to learn more. DEVELOPING MANAGEMENT SKILLS EIGHTH EDITION David A. Whetten BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Kim S. Cameron UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Prentice Hall

Fad2230 Exam 1 Study Guide - 2832 Words

Chapter 1: Why Study Families Other Close Relationships Family: a relationship by blood, marriage, or affection, in which members may cooperate economically, may care for children, may consider their identity to be intimately connected to the larger group. The U.S. Census Bureau Two or more people living together who are related by birth, marriage, or adoption. Family of Orientation: the family that you are born into. Family of procreation: the Family you make through marriage, partnering, /or parenthood. Fictive kin: Nonrelatives whose bonds are strong intimate. Marriage: an institutional agreement between persons to publicly recognize social intimate bonds. William Stevens Socially legitimate sexual union Begun with a†¦show more content†¦Describe Examine factors that predict or are associated with Explain the cause-and-effect relationships Examine the meanings interpretations Example: because of research, we know that violence among intimates is a serious and pervasive social problem. Survey: a form of research that gathers information about attitudes or behaviors through the answers that people give to questions. Random Sample: A sample in which every â€Å"person of interest† has an equal chance of being selected into your research study. In-depth interview: a research method that allows an interviewer to obtain detailed responses to questions. Experiment: a controlled method for determining cause effect. Focus group: a small interview of people who are brought together to discuss a particular topic. Observational study: research method that goes into the natural setting observes people in action. Secondary analysis: a research method in which the data were collected for some other purpose but still are useful to the researcher. Quantitative research: research that focuses on data that can be measured

Viktor Frankl’s Theory Approach from Graphology and the Enneagram Essay Sample free essay sample

I think everyone was surprised less Enneagram professionals who saw Ratzinger extremely developed Six personality. If we combine the constructs of the two subjects that better survey any personality construction – Graphology and Enneagram – we can easy analyse this honest. brave and consistent measure of 265 ? Pope of the Catholic Church. As we can see from the samples. his script is little. phlegmatic. with important simplifications that make it indecipherable sometimes. His script is pastelike. with a weak force per unit area. connected with arcades and missing in dynamism beat. At times it reminds me the script of Charles de Foucauld. the extraordinary Gallic mystic. Father Moretti would state that the script of His Holiness involves two tendencies: the careful observation and the contradiction. As a graphological regulation we know that the smaller the size. the more item you put in focal point and hence the greater the mental attempt needed to unite them into a gestalt. The inside informations are so of import to a 6 personality. as for any topic with this sort of script: Figure prevails over the background. which makes losing the overall position. Joseph Ratzinger – as a good 6 with flying 5 – is non a lover of a strong progress since an efficient monitoring and intellectualisation of his emotions are his enneatype amalgam. His little script – the willingness to accommodate. to subordinate their developed 6 – joins the large emerging. the opposition to any alteration possible: his superego. Very different from John Paul II ( enneatype 1. splanchnic ) . Ratzinger is rational. a thought adult male. an erudite who was taken from his favourite desk to a topographic point he neer wanted to be: the throne of Peter. This is called Coherence and Relationship in Morettiana School. Consistency and relationship of a enneatypes 6 incorporate leting the self-importance to move wittingly. His authorship is perpendicular. prioritising the cerebral over the emotional country. This confirms its enneatype ( or is it frailty versa? ) belonging to the intellectual three. rational. â€Å"centerverted† . Is he communicative†¦ ? Very small. The motion is slowed. Stopped. Weak. The narrowness between words. the arcades †¦ speak of this deficiency. The enneatypes 6 have a low profile. really merely that – nevertheless – do non lose their differentiation. Fear is an built-in portion of the construction around 6. Ratzinger is non immune to this irresistible impulse. Two universes – internal and external – live in him. But like any healthy person is brave in supporting their beliefs and ideas: this leads him to lose the fright and travel frontward. Something really hard in the manner of the six’s integrating. The Holy Father is moving from duty. A Six eneatype affirms: â€Å"Semper facere rectum† ( â€Å"Always do the right things† ) . BENEDICTO SixteenA VIKTOR FRANKL’S THEORY APPROACH FROM GRAPHOLOGY AND THE ENNEAGRAM [ electronic mail protected ]/*http//www. juliocavalli. com. ArSe permite su uso citando La fuente He is brooding. thanks to his five wing. and like the 6 of his native Germany. Ratzinger speaks through his organic structure: steady and direct regard. with little zigzags derived from his frights and with a distinguishable air of lasting concern. On February 28 at 20 autopsy. Rome clip. the See of Peter will be vacant. Benedict withdraws from public life to a shutting convent. The Pope is isolated †¦ but non far. but in his interior universe. familiar and known. which gives security and support. basic desires of all 6 eneatypes. Not to gamble. non to eventuality. He goes to Castelgandolfo and so to a sector of the Vatican: something normal in all 6w5. Ratzinger is perfectly positive that can non go on his ministry. And he besides knows that there is no solution for it. Merely 6 in full visible radiation. with a high degree of development can take a determination as brave and expose it to the universe with the repose and peace that gives his point of integrating that is 9. A six destabilized goes into terror. A 6 developed work accordingly with strong belief and repose. He overcame frights. He expanded his freedom. He learned that offending some regulation is good and healthy. This degree of development that shows the Holy Father reminds me the Frankl’s expression of freedom. Magdalena Bleyle holds that there are four grades of freedom: the physical ( deterministic. natural. the nature itself ) as the migration of the sups ; the psychological freedom. the free will ; the rational freedom. harmonizing to a moral and ethical rule and eventually. ontological freedom developed by Viktor Frankl. What is Ontological Freedom? It is the measure that makes a six enneatypes ( and by extension all people. independently of each eneatype ) to get the better of the physical. psychological. societal or rational conditionings. going this manner. in an â€Å"unconditioned person† ( Frankl ) . If Ratzinger had followed in his ministry and as a consequence of his physical. psychological. societal or rational conditionings. his pastoral administration had declined. cipher would knock. would object to his actions. Alternatively. everyone would warrant and even would understand since all this escapes the will of the individual ; it is a logical and perfectly normal. But His Holiness takes a measure frontward. Makes usage of that ontological freedom that Frankl speaks. He uses the ontological force of freedom. the force of spiritualty: overcomes his frights. â€Å"what people say† . societal and rational conditionings and he renounces. He becomes a free and responsible human being maestro of his ain fate: â€Å"For this ground. and good cognizant of the earnestness of this act. with full freedom I declare that I renounce the ministry of Bishop of Rome. Successor of Saint Peter. entrusted to me by the Cardinals on 19 April 2005† When a 6 accepts his ain fright. is bespeaking a high grade of wellness and development. His deep consciousness grows and evolves. No affair if you are 30 or 85 old ages. Frankl called this â€Å"Psychonoetic antagonism† . the resistance module of the spirit to get the better of the fortunes imposed by any type of conditioning. Joseph Ratzinger knew oasis to get the better of the projection which obscures the shrewdness of the six’s. BENEDICTO SixteenA VIKTOR FRANKL’S THEORY APPROACH FROM GRAPHOLOGY AND THE ENNEAGRAM [ electronic mail protected ]/*http//www. juliocavalli. com. ArSe permite su uso citando La fuente His perceptual experience is right and although projections are perceptual experiences. they more reflect the subjective head than world itself. The Holy Father provides for the jobs his deficiency of energy ( 8 ) could convey to the Church and the universe. because as all 6 specializes in observing what may travel incorrect. in seeing the glass half empty: â€Å"Dear Brothers. I have convoked you to this Consistory. non merely for the three canonizations. but besides to pass on to you a determination of great importance for the life of the Church† . His script shows his decreased verve which greatly limits his activity and emotional development: â€Å"†¦Both strength of head and organic structure are necessary. strength which in the last few months. has deteriorated in me to the extent that I have had to recognize my incapacity to adequately carry through the ministry entrusted to me† For that ground. his stepping down – in an act of unusual bravery. of enormous bravery and bravery – has an infinite virtue.Happy the Pope that does non turn from his developed consciousness! Happy all of us that we can observe his illustration! Julio Cavalli[ electronic mail protected ]/*World Wide Web. juliocavalli. com. Ar Muestras de Escrituras BENEDICTO SixteenA VIKTOR FRANKL’S THEORY APPROACH FROM GRAPHOLOGY AND THE ENNEAGRAM [ electronic mail protected ]/*http//www. juliocavalli. com. ArSe permite su uso citando La fuente BENEDICTO SixteenA VIKTOR FRANKL’S THEORY APPROACH FROM GRAPHOLOGY AND THE ENNEAGRAM [ electronic mail protected ]/*http//www. juliocavalli. com. ArSe permite su uso citando La fuente Escritura de 1977 BENEDICTO SixteenA VIKTOR FRANKL’S THEORY APPROACH FROM GRAPHOLOGY AND THE ENNEAGRAM [ electronic mail protected ]/*http//www. juliocavalli. com. ArSe permite su uso citando La fuente Escritura de 1977 BENEDICTO SixteenA VIKTOR FRANKL’S THEORY APPROACH FROM GRAPHOLOGY AND THE ENNEAGRAM [ electronic mail protected ]/*http//www. juliocavalli. com. ArSe permite su uso citando La fuente Poema de 1952 BENEDICTO SixteenA VIKTOR FRANKL’S THEORY APPROACH FROM GRAPHOLOGY AND THE ENNEAGRAM [ electronic mail protected ]/*http//www. juliocavalli. com. ArSe permite su uso citando La fuente

To Kill A Mockingbird Chapter Questions free essay sample

Atticus Finch is a wise, single father. He is a qualified, intelligent and distinguished lawyer practising in the south of Alabama in a rural town named Maycomb. Atticus has a high moral integrity and is bred from an upper-class background. He has a brother named Jack Finch and a sister named Alexandra. Atticus has two children named Jean-Louise Finch and Jem Finch. Jem is a quiet, studious boy who loves reading and football. Scout (Jean) is a tomboyish, confident girl who loves rolling in mud in her overalls and reading any book she can get her hands on. Maycomb is a close knit, old and rural town where everyone knows everyone. Its temperatures are always high and oak trees border its many long red dirt roads. 2) What game did the children play most of the summer? What was Atticus attitude when he suspected what they were playing? How is this incident suggestive of the issues that are raised in the novel as a whole? a) The children (Jem, Scout and Dill) played a game called Boo Radley. We will write a custom essay sample on To Kill A Mockingbird Chapter Questions or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page When Atticus discovered what the children were playing he voiced his disapproval of the game and told them that it was unnecessary and harsh to tease, mock or disturb Mr Arthur (Boo) and that they must cease to do so. The incident is suggestive of the issues written throughout the book on the lack of knowledge and experience with any kind of disorder and not knowing how to treat someone with a mental illness or social difference. 3) What purpose do you think the author has in telling about the childrens escapades? a) I think the purpose is to help show the childrens innocence and naivety to the world, it helps us really understand just how young they are but also surprisingly, just how much they manage to learn and understand as they grow and are faced with issues which force maturity and awareness. After the fire at Ms Maudie’s, things begin to happen that have a great influence on the lives of Scout and Jem. How is the novelist able to hint at the trouble to come? a) The fire at Ms Maudie’s house the day before the trial shows us how the town will help its own as the neighbourhood gave a hand in trying to salvage Ms Maudie’s property, I also think the fire marks the end of innocence for Jem and Scout, the book after this point is dominated by the trial of Tom Robinson which brings stark awareness and harsh times for the Finch children. What do you think made Atticus decide to defend Tom Robinson? What reasons does he give Scout for wanting to defend Tom? a) I think Atticus decided to defend Tom because he acknowledged the injustice towards Tom and wants to fight it, he felt he needed to face down Maycomb’s racism and support what he knows is right. He told Scout that he won’t win the case but has to take it in order to keep his integrity, that he couldn’t hold his head up if he didn’t fight for what he knew was right. 6) How did the children gradually become proud of their father and his quiet achievements? In chapter 11 a â€Å"mad dog† wanders though Maycomb. The finch children see the dog and after Atticus is notified, he arrives to submit a perfect headshot to the animal. The children then begin to learn that there is a great deal that they don’t know about their father and that he isn’t a boring old man after all. They gain a new respect for him but Scout is young and wants to brag whereas Jem, who is now maturing quickly understands that if this was something he wanted them to know about, he would have told them. Why does Jem have to read to Mrs Dubose? Do you think Atticus was right to make Jem do this? What do the children discover about Mrs Dubose? a) Jem is told by Atticus that he must read to Mrs Dubose daily for a month. This as punishment for destroying her Camellias, Jem did this in response to her slighting and condemning Atticus for defending Tom Robinson. I think that Atticus was right to make Jem do this. It was an important lesson in teaching Jem and Scout about courage and human dignity and it taught them to control their emotions. The children later discover after Mrs Dubose passes away that she was battling a morphine addiction and that the reading was helping her to overcome the habit before she died. They learn that though Mrs Dubose was prejudiced she was also courageous in fighting against the addiction even though she knew it was probably a lost cause, and they realise that courage isn’t strength or skill with a gun, its standing up for what’s right, no matter what. 8) Describe the relationship between Jem, Scout and Calpurina. Why did Aunt Alexandra object to Jem going to Calpurina’s church? Jem and Scout both see Calpurina as a strict but loving mother, she is the housemaid and cook but also essentially raised the Finch children. Aunt Alexandra objected to Jem attending Calpurina’s church because she felt it was inappropriate for him to be going to a lower class black church with the ‘hired help’, and that social class and gender roles are of the upmost importance. 9) What is the town’s reaction to Atticus’s defence of Tom Robinson at the trial? How does Atticus’s family suffer? Where does Atticus go on the Sunday evening before the trial? Why does he try to send the children home? a) The majority of Maycomb is shocked, Atticus’s determination to take and win the trial is powerful and most have never seen such a strong display of morality before, most of Maycomb would have nonchalantly stood by as Tom was accused guilty with barely any court defence. Jem and Scout both suffer at home and outside of the home as many people feel the need to express their prejudiced views to the children, this along with many other things is what led to the rapid maturity of mainly Jem, but Scout also. On the Sunday evening Atticus travels to the jail to stand guard and protect Tom Robinson as he was notified of possible â€Å"trouble and disturbance at the Jail’. When Jem and Dill run into the crowd, led by Scout, they are suddenly aware that they have walked into a bad situation. Though Jem realises the situation is precarious, he made a decision to stay and help Atticus protect Tom even after his father’s thorough protests. Dill and Scout on the other hand, are still too young to completely understand what is going on. They stand and fight with Jem though, knowing what he is doing will be what is right. Atticus continues to plea, order, threaten and at times, almost beg in a desperate attempt for the children to go home. He realises what a dangerous situation this is and could become if the mob turns violent so wants to protect them from this. 10) Why did the ‘Lynch Mob’ go home? What main point do you think the novelist hoped to make by introducing this episode into the story? a) The Lynch mob left the jail on Mr Cunningham’s command. Scout, who misunderstanding what’s going on, reminded him of his own human dignity. By asking question about his son Walter, Scout luckily struck a cord with Mr Cunningham and embarrassed him into leaving and dispersing the crowd. I think it points out how the prejudice escalated when the trial drew closer until it threatened violence. It also showed how there are people that can learn to overcome their prejudice and see past the racism. 11) What is the atmosphere in Maycomb on the day of the trial? a) The atmosphere that surrounds Maycomb on the trial day is one of apprehension, tension and excitement. Never before has a lawyer defended a black man so honestly, especially not in the small southern town of Maycomb. Everyone is shocked by Atticus’s courage in defending Tom, they all want to witness this rare case so the town fills the courtroom to its limit as each person hopes to catch a glimpse of this momentous event. 12) What is your impression of the persecution witnesses and their evidence? My impression is that the evidence is very circumstantial. There was no one else there to witness the ‘crime’ and only the statements of the people in question, which is suspicious and leads to reasonable doubt. Unfortunately this would never be taken to affect their case, as it is a white man’s word against a black’s so obviously the Ewell’s over ruled Tom’s statement. A black man would never be believed over a white man. 13) How did Scout and Jem feel after the trial? How did Atticus feel? What do you think of the verdict? Scout and especially Jem were totally astounded. To them the evidence was black and white, and the verdict should have been the same. They believed that with such solid evidence, Tom would be exonerated. This of course is true, the evidence should have been more than enough to save Tom, but the children learn once again that as Atticus said, â€Å"The one place where a man ought to get a square deal is in a courtroom, be he any colour of the rainbow, but people have a way of carrying their resentments right into a jury box. No matter how compounding the evidence, Tom would have been wrongly accused, Atticus also mentions, â€Å"In our courts, when it’s a white mans word against a black man’s, the white man always wins. They’re ugly, but those are the facts of life. † Which was utterly true. The injustice changes Jem and Scout and their childish innocent belief that they would win the case serves as a condemnation of the racist adult society of Maycomb. 14) After the trial Jem said, â€Å"There’s four kinds of folk in the world†, but Scout said, â€Å"There’s just one kind of folks†. Do you agree with Jem or Scout? Why? a) I agree with both, there is in reality just one kind of ‘folk’. We are all human and totally equal, but in the same sense there are also four or more kinds of people. Although we all like to think all of man is treated equally, we are not. As much as we don’t like to acknowledge it, we are all governed by social and economic class and in some parts of the world, we are still ruled by race and gender prejudice. Class separates us all to this day, in school, work, home and everywhere else. ‘The poplars’ govern schools socially. Managers govern work, towns/cities and even countries are controlled by people who have had opportunities throughout their lives that others haven’t. This is not something that I imagine will change for many generations, if ever. It’s the way the world works; survival of the fittest has controlled our lives since the beginning of man and probably will continue to do so for a very long time. 15) What did Jem suggest as the real reason why Boo Radley stayed shut up all the time? What do you think of his suggestion? Jem suggested that Boo stayed ‘shut up’ inside his house because he wants to. This makes sense. The pressure of everyday life causes many people to want hibernate, shy away from society and refuse to face up to everyday responsibilities. Life is daunting and corrupt in many ways, and to Boo whom experiences social ‘disadvantages’ or disabilities, this would make it even harder. I can understand why he would stay inside, people didn’t understand why he was different in those times so Boo would not receive any extra help or guidance and would be harshly ladled and tormented. What impression did you get of Maycomb’s ladies from the tea party? What is their attitude to the Murnas? And to Maycomb’s Negroes? Do you agree with Mrs Merriweather who says at least they are not hypocrites? a) The impression of Maycomb’s ladies is that they are Their attitude towards the Murnas is†¦. Mrs Merriweather is totally wrong, they are the definition of hypocrisy. She talks of â€Å"helping† the people of Africa, when in fact; she would never treat them as equals. This is easily indicated by her condescending attitude toward the black population of Maycomb. What do we learn about Bob Ewell’s behaviour in the months after the trial? What does this indicate? a) Bob became increasingly violent and offensive towards the Finch’s as he was consumed by hate. This shows that he was proud, superficial man, unable to forget the fact that Atticus made him out to be the fool in the trial. He is holding a grudge towards Atticus for affecting his reputation and dignity. Bob is the type of man that will get angry, and then get even. This frightens the Finch children to no end and with good reason! Why did Heck Tate insist Bob Ewell fell on his own knife? Do you think he was right? a) Sherriff Tate insisted this because he did not want to involve Boo in the death. He decided that Boo was saving other peoples lives and doesn’t need more attention. I think he was right to do that, Boo is an innocent who is unable to deal with the sadness and messiness of the outside world so involving him would have been cruel as Scout says, â€Å"Bringing attention to Boo would be like shooting a Mockingbird. You never really know a man until you stand in his shoes and walk around in them. † What had Scout learned about Boo Radley by the time she returned home that night? a) Scout learnt to understand Atticus’s lesson about walking in another man’s shoes, after walking Boo home she sees her and Jem’s life as Boo must have seen it. She stood in Boo’s skin and felt his dignity, seeing things from his point of view made her realise what Atticus had meant. 20) â€Å"I don’t know, but they did it. They’ve done it before and they did it tonight and they’ll do it again and when they do it – it seems only the children weep. Goodnight. † What does Atticus mean by this? What does the statement say about society? a) Atticus is saying how weeping innocent children are a condemnation of the wicked, weak and uncaring adults. The statement talks about the injustice that doesn’t seem to affect the adults, only the children, because they are young, caring and unprejudiced. It shows how society is made up of adults that sadly seem to lack goodness, courage and basic human dignity.